If there's one thing you can be sure of, it's that sensible people can take quite different views of a conversation just had - let alone of a 2000 year-old document from a society utterly different to our own.
Solemnibus
Learning to write
Friday, April 30, 2004
Previous Posts
- An anchorless text Last night we did our study on...
- And breakfast at the Leuven this morning was... S...
- From the darkest orifice of all The single redeem...
- All things eco-centric Doug Wilson points out tha...
- Written on the subway walls "This is an exhortati...
- The Wandering Sister Yes, she'll be back (by popu...
- Breakfast, Leuven, Featherston St, Wellington, Thu...
- The church militant This post by John Barach des...
- Conversation & Status It is good to be aware of w...
- In the vernacular, "wanking". Self-rape, to be mo...
liturgy & narrative
- The hardship of faith
- 'Legalism' as merit and markers
- Galatians & the scope of the gospel
- John the Baptist & baptism today
- Psalmody & Imprecations
- A Fairy Story
- The Story of Eden
- Does holiness demand unity?
- Covenant baptism
- Knowledge in Van Til & Kant
reviews
problems & responses
- Closing wombs: Christ's curse
- Christianity & Creation's survival
- Practicing Hope: a foretaste of shalom
- Needed: a theology of place
- On the loss of virginity
- Body-life: the uncool and the aged
- Justice and the Treaty
- Stewardship & Eco-justice
- Bono: Justice & Equality
- Worship & Culture
- 'Culture' and 'problems'
etchings
<< Home